dropbox link
Phenolic profile and antioxidant activity in selected seeds and sprouts
- Department of Food Analysis and Quality Assessment, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture, Balicka Str. 122, 30-149 Krakow, Poland
- Received 20 March 2013, Revised 5 July 2013, Accepted 16 July 2013, Available online 22 July 2013
Highlights
- •
- We examined the influence of germination on the characteristics of selected seeds and sprouts.
- •
- Free and bound phenolic compounds, before and after alkaline hydrolysis, were determined.
- •
- Increase of phenolics content and antioxidant activity was observed during germination.
- •
- There were high linear correlations between total polyphenol contents and antioxidant activities.
Abstract
The
aim of this study was to investigate the effect of germination on the
phenolic acids and flavonoids profile, as well as antioxidant activity
(AA), in selected edible seeds of mung beans, radish, broccoli and
sunflower. Germination increased the total phenolic (TP) and flavonoid
(TF) levels, as well as the AA of the seeds, and influenced the profile
of free and bound phenolic compounds. Among the samples, mung bean was
characterised by lowest levels of TP and TF, as well as AA, evaluated
using ABTS, DPPH and FRAP assays. Sunflower and radish sprouts were the
most rich in phenolic compounds. Insignificant amounts of free phenolic
acids were found in the free phenolic acid fraction; alkaline hydrolysis
of the seeds and sprouts extracts provided the majority of the phenolic
acids. The amounts of free and bound flavonoids were inconsiderable
both for seeds and sprouts.
Keywords
- Seeds;
- Sprouts;
- Flavonoids;
- Phenolic acids;
- Antioxidant activity;
- HPLC
1. Introduction
Plant-based
foods are a good source of nutrients, dietary fibre, mineral and
phenolic compounds. Unfortunately, fresh fruits and vegetables are
usually seasonal and therefore they are expensive out of season.
Furthermore, most of the out-of-season crops are cultivated under
artificial conditions, and then they are prematurely harvested and
exported to other parts of the world. All these factors result in a
decline in a nutrient value of the crops. An excellent alternative for
plant foods are sprouts, which can be consumed in fresh form at all
times of the year. Edible seeds and sprouts are a good source of
antioxidants, such as: phenolic acids, flavonoids, trace elements and
vitamins (Pasko et al., 2009).
These plants qualify as a functional food, providing natural protection
against heart disease and some forms of cancer. Common sprouting seeds
include mung beans, radish, broccoli, sunflower, lentil, soybean,
alfalfa, cabbage, wheat, rice, pea, amaranth, quinoa and others. In
Poland the most popular seeds used for germination are mung bean,
radish, broccoli and sunflower.
Germination of edible seeds to produce sprouts increases their nutritive value (Dueñas et al., 2009, Hung et al., 2011 and Martinez-Villaluenga et al., 2010).
Several studies have reported higher levels of nutrients and lower
contents of antinutrients in sprouts compared to the ungerminated seeds (Martinez-Villaluenga et al., 2010, Oloyo, 2004 and Zieliński et al., 2005).
However, information about free and bound phenolics in raw and sprouted
seeds is scarce. The content and composition of bioactive compounds in
the sprouts depends on many factors, e.g. climatic and agronomic
conditions of growth, storage conditions of sprouts, level of their
maturity, and also on their variety (Cevallos-Casals & Cisneros-Zevallos, 2010).
Due to the fact that sprouts are considered as a cheap and relatively
new source of functional foods it is necessary to determine and
characterise bioactive compounds occurring in ready-to-eat germinated
seeds.
The aim of this study
was to investigate the effect of germination on the phenolic acids and
flavonoids profile, as well as antioxidant activity, in the seeds and
sprouts of mung beans, radish, broccoli and sunflower.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Chemicals
Methanol,
sodium carbonate, and potassium persulfate were purchased from POCh
(Gliwice, Poland). Other reagents (aluminium chloride, sodium nitrate,
sodium hydroxide, ascorbic acid and acetic acids, iron(III) chloride,
hydrochloric acid, di-sodium EDTA, sodium acetate) were obtained from
Chempur (Piekary Śląskie, Poland). Folin–Ciocalteau reagent,
2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH),
2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid diammonium salt)
(ABTS), TPTZ (2,4,6-tri(2-pyridyl-s-triazine)) were purchased
from Sigma–Aldrich Chemie (Steinheim, Germany). All standards of
phenolic acids and flavonoids were from Sigma–Aldrich Chemie or Fluka
Chemie AG (Buchs, Switzerland).
2.2. Materials
Seeds of mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek), radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. ‘Flamboyant 2’), broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ‘Ramoso Calabrese’) were purchased from Diet Food (Warsaw, Poland), and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seeds from KHNO POLAN Ltd (Krakow, Poland).
2.2.1. Seed germination
Seeds
were sterilised for 1 min by immersion in ethanol. Then the seeds were
steeped in deionised water in ratio 1:10 (m/v) for 12 h. After pouring
off the soaking water, the seeds were spread on sterile stackable trays
(three for one species) and were washed twice a day using deionised
water to avoid microbial growth. Sunflower seeds were initially peeled
of their shells.
Germination
of the seeds was carried out at room temperature in the range of
22 ± 1 °C (12/12 h day/night). Sprouted seeds were harvested after
5 days of growth. The seeds and their sprouts were lyophilised with an
Alpha 1–4 freeze-dry system (Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen
GmbH, Osterode, Germany), ground in a knife mill Grindomix GM 200
(Retsch, Düsseldorf, Germany) and stored in the dark until further
analyses.
2.3. Procedure of extraction
Methanol extraction was carried out according to the method of Khattak, Zeb, Bibi, Khalil, and Khattak (2007).
The ground seeds (5 g) and sprouts (3 g) were extracted for 20 min by
shaking with 20 ml of methanol (99.8%) in a screw-capped tube.
Extractions were carried out three times. The combined extracts were
centrifuged at 10 000 rpm for 10 min and the organic solvents were
removed at 35 ± 3 °C using a rotary vacuum evaporator RVO 200A (INGOS
Laboratory Instruments Ltd., Prague, Czech Republic). The obtained
residue was dissolved in 10 ml of methanol (99.8%) and stored in a
freezer until analysis. The extraction procedure was carried out in
triplicate.
2.3.1. Determination of total phenolic content
Total phenolic content of methanolic extracts was assayed as described by Meda, Lamien, Romito, Millogo, and Nacoulma (2005),
using Folin–Ciocalteau reagent with final reaction measurements carried
out at 760 nm. A 0.1-ml aliquot of methanolic extract was diluted with
0.4 ml of deionised water, then the obtained solution was mixed with
2.5 ml of 0.2 M Folin–Ciocalteau reagent and 2 ml of 7.5% (m/v) sodium
carbonate solution. After 2 h of incubation, the absorbance was measured
against a blank, using UV/Vis spectrophotometer V-530 (Jasco, Tokyo,
Japan). Total phenolic content was expressed as mg of gallic acid
equivalents (GAE) per g dry matter (d.m.) of seeds and sprouts.
2.3.2. Determination of total flavonoids content
Total flavonoid content in seeds and sprouts was analysed by a spectrophotometric method described by Boateng, Verghese, Walker, and Ogutu (2008).
The method is based on the reaction between the flavonoids and
aluminium chloride, forming a yellow complex. Four millilitres of
deionised water and 0.3 ml of sodium nitrate solution (15 g/100 ml) were
added to 1 ml of appropriately diluted methanol extract. After that
0.3 ml of aluminium chloride methanolic solution (10 g/100 ml) and 4 ml
of sodium hydroxide solution with concentration (4 g/100 ml) were added
to the resulting solution and then the whole sample was diluted with
deionised water to a final volume of 10 ml. The mixture was stirred and
left to stand for 15 min and finally absorbance was measured at 510 nm.
The total flavonoids content in the extracts was compared to the
standard curve for quercetin solutions and expressed as mg of quercetin
equivalents (QE) per g d.m. of seeds and sprouts.
2.3.3. Determination of ABTS cation radical-scavenging activity
Determination
of ABTS cation radical-scavenging activity was based on the reduction
of the ABTS cation radical (dissolved in phosphate buffered saline
(PBS)) by methanolic extracts from seeds and sprouts according to the
method of Martinez-Villaluenga et al. (2010).
ABTS cation radical was obtained in the reaction of 2 mM
phospate-buffered stock solution of
2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt
(ABTS) with potassium persulfate. The mixture was left to stand for
24 h, until the reaction was completed and then ABTS solution was
dilluted by PBS to obtain an absorbance of 0.800 ± 0.03 at λ = 734 nm. Fifty microlitres of appropriately diluted methanolic extract of seeds or sprouts was mixed with 6 ml of the ABTS
+
solution and the absorbance of the resulting solution was measured
after 15 min at 734 nm. Antioxidant activity was expressed as mg of
Trolox equivalents per g d.m. of seeds and sprouts.
2.3.4. Determination of DPPH radical-scavenging activity
In order to determine DPPH radical-scavenging activity a method described by Moure et al. (2001)
was used with minor modification. An aliquot of 3.9 ml of 0.1 mM DPPH
radical in methanol was mixed with 0.1 ml of methanolic extract of the
sample. After 60 min of incubation the absorbance of the sample was
measured at 515 nm in a UV/Vis spectrophotometer (V-530; Jasco, Tokyo,
Japan). The DPPH radical-scavenging activity in the extracts was
expressed as mg of Trolox equivalents per g d.m. of seeds and sprouts.
2.3.5. Determination of ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)
The ferric ion reducing activity of the methanol extracts was measured according to the method of Benzie and Strain (1996) with some modifications. At low pH, when a ferric-tripyridyltriazine (FeIII-TPTZ) complex is reduced to the ferrous (FeII)
form, an intense blue colour develops with an absorption maximum at
593 nm. To 3.3 ml of acetate buffer (pH 3.6) consisting of 18.5 ml 0.2 M
CH3COOH and 1.5 ml 0.2 M CH3COONa, 0.33 ml 20 mM FeCl3 and 0.33 ml 10 mM TPTZ (2,4,6-tri(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine)
in 40 mM HCl were added. After 5 min of incubation at 37 °C, an aliquot
of 0.33 ml of methanol extract was added to the mixture and the
absorbance was measured at 593 nm after a further 15 min of incubation
at 37 °C. Ferric reducing antioxidant power was expressed as mmol of Fe2+ per 100 g d.m. of seeds and sprouts.
2.3.6. Free phenolic acids and flavonoids
Free
phenolic acids and flavonoids were analysed by high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC; LaChrom, Merck-Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) using UV
detection, according to the method described by Socha et al. (2011)
with minor modifications. The samples were separated on an ODS Hypersil
column (250 × 4.6 μm × 5 μm, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham,
MA) at a temperature of 30 °C. Phenolic acids, such as gallic,
protocatechuic, syringic and vanillic were detected at 280 nm, and
chlorogenic, ferulic, caffeic, p-coumaric and synapic acids at
320 nm. Flavonoids (quercetin, kaempferol, apigenin and luteolin) were
monitored at 360 nm. Chromatographic separation was performed with
gradient elution at a flow rate of 1 ml min−1 using two
solvents: A – 2.5 g per 100 ml of acetic acid, and B – acetonitrile, as
mobile phases. The chromatographic analysis was conducted as follows:
for the first 10 min a linear gradient was applied, with mobile phase B
increasing from 3% to 8%, followed by increase in phase B to 15%, 20%,
30% and 40% at 20, 30, 40 and 50 min, respectively. Finally the column
was eluted isocratically for 10 min before the next injection. Before
the chromatographic analyses, methanol extracts were filtered using
0.45 μm Millex-LCR syringe filters (PTFE), then purified using Hyper Sep
C18 columns (500 mg, 6 ml; Polygen, Gliwice, Poland) and appropriately
diluted. The qualitative measurement of the individual phenolic acids
was based on comparison with standards from Sigma–Aldrich Chemie and
Fluka Chemie AG. The calibration curves of the analysed phenolics were
made in triplicate for each individual standard and were plotted
separately for each standard at concentrations in the range of
0.02–0.2 mg/ml.
2.4. The hydrolytic procedure and extraction of bound phenolic compounds
The hydrolytic procedure of bound phenolic compounds from seeds and sprouts was carried out according the method of Ross, Beta, and Arntfield (2009).
The ground sample (0.5 g) was mixed with 7 ml of methanol containing
10% acetic acid (85:15 v/v). The mixture was sonicated for 30 min and
its volume was adjusted to 10 ml with deionised water. The obtained
extract was mixed with 10 ml of deionised water and 5 ml of 10 M NaOH
(containing 2% ascorbic acid and 13.4 mM EDTA). The mixture was flushed
with argon and stirred for 16 h at ambient temperature. The pH of the
solution was carefully adjusted to the value of 2 by dropwise addition
of 6 M HCl and then the solution was saturated with NaCl.
Extraction of phenolic compounds was carried out as was previously described by Nardini and Ghiselli (2004).
The liberated phenolic compounds were extracted three times with 25 ml
of ethyl acetate. The mixture was combined and centrifuged for 10 min at
10 000 rpm (MPW-350; MPW Med. Instruments, Warsaw, Poland). The upper
organic layer containing the phenolic compounds liberated during
alkaline hydrolysis was collected from the bottom aqueous residue layer
by pipetting. Ethyl acetate was evaporated to dryness using a rotary
evaporator at 35 ± 3 °C. The residue was dissolved in 5 ml of methanol
and stored at −18 °C in a test tube with stopper. Bound phenolic acids
and flavonoids were analysed by HPLC according to the procedure
described in Section 2.3.6.
2.5. Statistical analysis
The
results were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance, and the least
significant difference (LSD) using Fisher test at significance level
0.05 was calculated. The Pearson’s linear correlation coefficients
between selected parameters were also calculated.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Total phenolic content
Cereals
and vegetables (including seed and sprouts) are a good source of
phenolic compounds. According to literature data broccoli and radish are
rich in anthocyanins, phenolic acids and flavonols (in particular,
kaempferol and quercetin) (Koh, Wimalasiri, Chassy, & Mitchell, 2009). Broccoli sprouts are even richer in phenolic compounds than commercial broccoli florets (Vallejo, Tomás-Barberán, & García-Viguera, 2002). Legumes contain high concentration of isoflavones (Lin & Lai, 2006). Predominant phenolics in sunflower seeds are chlorogenic, quinic and caffeic acids (Weisz, Kammerer, & Carle, 2009).
Germination resulted in significant changes in the phenolic
composition, due mainly to activation of endogenous enzymes and the
complex biochemical metabolism of seeds during this process (Dueñas et al., 2009).
Fig. 1 presents total phenolic content (expressed as mg GAE g−1)
in analysed seeds and sprouts. Germination increased the total phenolic
content of most seeds in order: mung bean (841%) > sunflower
(232%) > radish (206%) > broccoli (68%). These results are in
agreement with those published by Cevallos-Casals and Cisneros-Zevallos (2010),
who reported that mung bean was the seed with the greatest increase in
phenolics during germination compared to twelve other edible seed
species. However, in our study, the increase of TP content in mung bean
sprouts was lower (841%) than those observed by Cevallos-Casals and Cisneros-Zevallos (2010),
who also reported that the phenolic contents decreased in the following
order: mung bean > sunflower > broccoli > radish. These
differences may result from the diversity among varieties, growing and
storage conditions, as well as the extraction procedures (Gawlik-Dziki and Kowalczyk, 2007, Luthria and Pastor-Corrales, 2006, Naczk and Shahidi, 2004 and Ross et al., 2009).
- Fig. 1.
Total phenolic content in seeds and sprouts, expressed as gallic acid equivalent (GAE) in mg per 1 g of plant dry mass.
Paśko et al. (2009)
also reported higher total phenolic content in sprouts compared to
seeds, suggesting that synthesis of phenolic antioxidants during
germination may occur. It is thought that seeds mainly act as a
reservoir for the development of the sprouts (Pérez-Balibrea, Moreno, & García-Viguera, 2011).
3.2. Total flavonoid content
The total flavonoid content in seeds and sprouts determined as quercetin equivalents is presented in Fig. 2.
The greatest quantity of flavonoids content was found in sunflower
sprouts (45.6 mg/g d.m.), followed by broccoli (37.1 mg/g d.m.) and
radish (34.8 mg/g d.m.) sprouts. The lowest amount of these compounds
was determined in mung beans sprouts (13.7 mg/g d.m.). A similar trend
was observed for the seeds, however those values were almost 50% lower
than in sprouts.
The total flavonoids content determined in this study was in accordance with the results of Kim, Jeong, Gorinstein, and Chon (2012).
These authors found that germination of mung bean increased (nearly
three times) the flavonoid level, compared to the dry seeds, and this
increment depended on the mung bean variety. These results agree with
those reported by Dueñas et al. (2009), who observed twofold increase of flavones, dihydroflavonols and isoflavones in lupin sprouts after ten days of germination.
3.3. Antioxidant activity
An
increase in phenolic compounds content along with the seeds germination
may influence their free radical scavenging activity. The methanolic
extracts of the seeds and sprouts studied were analysed in respect to
their antioxidant activity against ABTS and DPPH radicals. The ferric
ion reducing activity of the methanolic extracts (FRAP method) was also
measured. The results are presented in Table 1.
- Table 1. Antioxidant activity of mung bean, broccoli, radish and sunflower seeds and sprouts.
Sample
Antioxidant activity
ABTS + [mg Trolox/g d.m.]
DPPH [mg trolox/g d.m.]
FRAP [mmol Fe2+/100 g d.m.] Seeds Mung bean 0.86 ± 0.02 0.11 ± 0.00 0.13 ± 0.01 Radish 10.52 ± 0.10 3.10 ± 0.05 7.50 ± 0.09 Broccoli 8.86 ± 0.29 3.10 ± 0.07 7.10 ± 0.29 Sunflower 7.75 ± 0.64 5.91 ± 0.42 4.69 ± 0.14 Sprouts Mung bean 11.33 ± 0.34 1.41 ± 0.11 1.20 ± 0.01 Radish 24.67 ± 0.06 6.07 ± 0.14 10.49 ± 0.50 Broccoli 12.33 ± 0.27 3.65 ± 0.31 8.64 ± 0.16 Sunflower 18.38 ± 0.16 11.47 ± 0.05 11.05 ± 0.10 LSD0.05 0.52 0.35 0.43
Antioxidant
activity of seeds was generally found to increase during germination.
The sprouts of radish demonstrated the highest antioxidant activity,
evaluated using the ABTS method, followed by sunflower sprouts. Mung
bean sprouts exhibited the lowest AA, while broccoli sprouts
demonstrated only slightly higher free radical scavenging activity. An
increase in the antioxidant activity during the germination process was
also observed in the reaction with DPPH free radical. However, in this
case the sunflower sprouts exhibited the highest antioxidant capacity,
followed by radish, broccoli and mung bean. It was also observed that
the values of antioxidant activity increased almost twelve-fold for mung
bean, twice for radish and sunflower, and by one-fifth in the case of
broccoli sprouts, when compared to the seeds. Samotyja, Zdziebłowski, Szlachta, and Małecka (2007)
have also observed that sunflower sprouts exhibited the highest AA
against DPPH compared to radish, mung bean, wheat and lentil sprouts.
The improvement of antioxidant activity during germination of broccoli
and radish seeds up to the 4th day of germination was also reported by Martinez-Villaluenga et al. (2010).
The increment of AA values during germination seems to be related to
the rise in the content of antioxidant compounds, such as vitamins and
polyphenols. However, these authors recorded a decrease in AA as
germination proceeded.
There were high and significant linear correlations (α = 0.05) between total polyphenols content and antioxidant activity evaluated using ABTS and FRAP assays (r = 0.954 and 0.908, respectively), and these results suggest that phenolic compounds are good predictors of in vitro antioxidant activity ( Paśko et al., 2009). The weaker but still statistically significant (r = 0.654)
correlation between total phenolic content and antioxidant activity
measured in the reaction with DPPH radical suggests, that non-phenolic
compounds, for example tocopherols or L-ascorbic acid, may be potential
scavengers of DPPH radicals. Moure et al. (2001)
reported that in beans among the compounds that have been reported to
act as antioxidants are water soluble proteins, peptides and amino
acids, as well as oligosaccharides from the hemicellulosic fractions.
Lower, but also statistically significant correlations (α = 0.05) between total flavonoid content and AA determined using ABTS, DPPH and FRAP methods (r = 0.760, 0.868 and 0.846, respectively) were observed.
Influence
of germination process on the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)
of the analysed samples was significant. Higher antioxidant potential
(FRAP) was found in sprouts. The germination process resulted in almost
ten-fold increase of ferric reducing antioxidant power in mung bean and
over twice for sunflower seeds. Broccoli and radish sprouts had only
about 20% and 40% (respectively) greater reducing ability than their
seeds. Paśko, Sajewicz, Gorinstein, and Zachwieja (2008)
reported higher antioxidative activity (AA) in amaranthus and lower in
quinoa sprouts (grown in daylight) compared to AA of sprouts. The AA of
the amaranth sprouts ranged from 10.3 to 24.8 mmol Fe2+/100 g d.m., whereas AA of the quinoa ranged from 4.2 to 7.7 mmol Fe2+/100 g d.m.
(depending on the time of growth and varieties). The AA of the sprouts
was several times higher than that of seeds. An increase of in antioxidative activity after germination was also observed by Dueñas et al., 2009 and Martinez-Villaluenga et al., 2010, and Paśko et al. (2009). This process is attributed to the biochemical metabolism of seeds during germination (Dueñas et al., 2009).
Higher AA of sprouts compared to seeds may result from differences in
the content of polyphenols, anthocyanins and other compounds (Paśko et al., 2009). Samotyja et al. (2007)
reported that sunflower sprouts had the highest antioxidative activity
(estimated by the FRAP method), followed by radish sprouts. Mung bean
sprouts had much less AA than sunflower and radish sprouts, and these
data confirm results obtained in our study.
3.4. The profile of free phenolic acids and flavonoids
Phenolic
acids occur in plants in different forms, such as aglycones (free
phenolic acids), esters, glycosides, and/or bound complexes (Ross et al., 2009). In this study free phenolic acids extracted with methanol were determined (Table 2).
- Table 2. Free phenolic acids and flavonoids content of seeds and sprouts extracts (mg/100 g d.m.) determined by HPLC.
Name of sample
Phenolic acids
Total Flavonoids
Total Gallic Protocatechuic Caffeic p-Coumaric Ferulic Chlorogenic Sinapic Quercetin Kaempferol Luteolin Apigenin [mg/100 g d.m.]
[mg/100 g d.m.]
Seeds Mung bean 0.30 n.d. 0.03a 0.02 0.22a n.d. 0.15 0.72 0.02 0.01 n.d. n.d. 0.03 Radish 1.31a 1.43a 3.74b 1.88 2.10 n.d. 0 10.46 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. Broccoli 1.57a 1.33a 3.25b 0.84 1.17 12.02a 0.56ab 20.74 0.38a n.d. n.d. n.d. 0.38 Sunflower 1.12a 5.08 2.55 0.25 1.69 n.d. 1.56 12.25 0.15a 0.05 n.d. 0.29 0.49 Sprouts Mung bean 4.55b n.d. 0.25a 0.14 2.64 1.08 1.29 9.95 0.24a 0.18 0.1 0.19 0.71 Radish 5.29b 3.34b 9.61c 1.21 0.22a n.d. 0.65b 20.32 7.09 0.10 n.d. n.d. 7.19 Broccoli 16.10 3.84b 6.96 0.70 0.39a 11.49a 0.46a 39.94 0.29a 0.09 1.61 0.78 2.77 Sunflower 2.54 7.53 9.51c 1.71 2.93 n.d. 3.24 27.46 0.37a 0.08 n.d. n.d. 0.45 - Within columns, values with the same superscripts do not differ significantly at p < 0.05.
It was found that among free phenolic acids, caffeic, chlorogenic and gallic acids
occurred in the largest amounts (both in seeds and sprouts). Among the
studied samples mung bean seeds and sprouts exhibited the lowest total
phenolic acids content and broccoli the highest.
An increase in total phenolic acids content was observed with the
germination process for all seeds. The total phenolic acids content
ranged from 0.72 mg/100 g d.m. in mung bean seeds to 9.95 mg/100 g d.m.
in mung bean sprouts (where gallic and ferulic acids were the
predominant compounds). Luthria and Pastor-Corrales (2006) identified only three phenolic acids – p-coumaric,
ferulic and sinapic – in fifteen edible beans; however, caffeic acid
was identified in quantifiable amounts in only two varieties. According
to these authors the total phenolic acids content among all 15 dry bean
samples varied between 19.1 and 48.3 mg/100 g and was much higher than
the values found in the seeds we studied. Higher content of phenolic
acids (ca. 4–8 mg/100 g d.m. depending on the variety) in
comparison to our results, was also found in three different lupin
species studied by Siger et al. (2012).
The authors reported that there was variability in the quantitative
compositions of phenolic acids in seeds between the lupin species.
The sunflower seeds and sprouts investigated in our study had diverse phenolic acids profiles.,
with caffeic and protocatechuic acids being predominant in sunflower
extracts. Germination increased the total phenolic acids over twice from
12.3 mg/100 g d.m. in seeds to 27.5 mg/100 g d.m. in sprouts. Cevallos-Casals and Cisneros-Zevallos (2010)
reported that sunflower sprouts seem to have the one of the highest
antioxidant activities among fruits and vegetables. The major phenolic
compounds identified by these authors in sunflower seeds were
chlorogenic acid (and its derivatives) and caffeic acid. They found a
high phenolic content in radish, broccoli, mustard and fava seeds.
Broccoli and mustard sprouts after 7-days of germination had the highest
phenolic compounds content among the samples.
The
predominant acid determined in broccoli seeds was chlorogenic, while
gallic, chlorogenic and caffeic acids were identified in sprouts. These
results are not in accordance with the data reported by Pérez-Balibrea et al. (2011),
where the main free phenolic acids found in broccoli seeds and sprouts
were ferulic and sinapic acids. The concentration of these compounds was
much higher than in our study and ranged from 18.9 to 35.2 mg/100 g of
fresh weight, depending on the time of growth and broccoli variety. Gawlik-Dziki et al. (2012)
reported that ethanolic extracts of broccoli sprouts revealed
considerable amounts of hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives, such as
sinapinic and ferulic acid (17.9 and 4.70 μg/g f.w., respectively) and
chlorogenic acid (13.3 μg/g f.w.). In that study significant amounts of
benzoic acid and its derivatives, including salicylic and gallic acids
were also found in broccoli sprouts.
The differences between phenolic contents
reported in various studies could result from multiple factors, such as
methodology (procedure of extraction, different susceptibilities to
degradation, type of chromatography and quantification), plant species,
growth and storage environments (Naczk and Shahidi, 2004, Pérez-Balibrea et al., 2011 and Ross et al., 2009).
However, the results obtained in our study show that mung bean seeds
and sprouts were the poorest in phenolic compounds and exhibited the
lowest AA among the samples studied and these results are in accordance
with the literature data (Cevallos-Casals, & Cisneros-Zevallos, 2010).
The increases in phenolic content and antioxidant capacity show
potentially important roles of phenolics during germination, as well as
potential enhancement of nutraceutical value of seeds by the germination
process (Cevallos-Casals, & Cisneros-Zevallos, 2010).
The
following free flavonoids were identified in the studied seeds and
sprouts: quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin and apigenin. The amounts of
the flavonoids presented in Table 2
were inconsiderable both for seeds and for sprouts. Radish sprouts were
the exception, because they contained 7.19 mg of flavonoids per 100 g
of dry mass. There were no free flavonoids detected in radish seeds;
however, considerable amounts of flavonoids were observed after alkaline
hydrolysis (Table 3).
The predominant flavonoid in radish sprouts was quercetin. Luteolin was
identified in broccoli and mung bean sprouts, while apigenin was
detected in sunflower seeds, mung bean and broccoli sprouts. Karamać, Kosińska, Estrella, Hernández, and Dueñas (2012)
also identified several flavonoids in six different fractions of
sunflower seeds. These compounds were classified as quercetin
derivatives, diglycoside, rutinoside, glucoronide and flavanone. The sum
of these compounds ranged from 0 to 9.84 mg/g depending on the
fraction. Paśko et al. (2008) identified no flavonoids in Amaranthus cruentus
v. Aztek seeds, but found vitexin, and isovitexin in the seeds of
amaranth v. Rava (total amount of 67.6 mg/100 g d.m.), and orientin,
vitexin, rutin, morin and traces of hesperidin and neohesperidin in
quinoa seeds (total amount of 224 mg/100 g d.m.). In the case of
amaranthus v. Aztek and quinoa the total amounts of flavonoids were
higher in sprouts grown in daylight than in the seeds. These amounts
were much higher than the values obtained in our study for seeds and
sprouts of mung bean, radish, broccoli and sunflower. The main phenolic
compounds found in extract of green lentil seeds by Troszynska et al. (2011)
were catechin, quercetin and kaempferol derivatives. The sprouts were
found to be rich in acylated flavonol glycosides, with the maximum
content of polyphenols determined after seven days of germination. The
results obtained by the abovementioned authors indicate that germination
is a process which modifies both qualitative and quantitative
polyphenolic composition of seeds over time, resulting in a significant
increase in flavonoids content.
- Table 3. Bound phenolic acids and flavonoids content of seeds and sprouts extracts (mg/100 g d.m.) determined by HPLC.
Name of sample
Phenolic acids
Total Flavonoids
Total Gallic Protocatechuic Vanillic Caffeic p-Coumaric Ferulic Chlorogenic Sinapic Quercetin Kaempferol Luteolin Apigenin [mg/100 g d.m.]
[mg/100 g d.m.]
Seeds Mung bean 0.54a n.d. n.d. 1.29a 1.06a n.d. n.d. 22.46a 25.35 1.09abc n.d. 0.36a n.d. 1.45 Radish 3.13 3.98 11.7 4.50a 6.09a 35.64 n.d. 994c 1059 1.36ab 0.50 3.54b n.d. 5.40 Broccoli 0.36a 7.61 n.d. 2.03a 0.69a 1.58 1.47 566b 579 0.99ac 0.42a 1.23 7.51 10.15 Sunflower 1.30b 4.82 n.d. 749 1.27a n.d. n.d. 1.55a 758 0.43c n.d. n.d. n.d. 0.43 sprouts Mung bean 1.29b 5.41 n.d. 79.5 67.71 13.50 n.d. 15.2a 183 0.54bc 0.11 0.35a 0.44a 1.44 Radish 3.85 n.d. n.d. 3.78a 3.11a 12.32 n.d. 948c 971 1.38a 0.37a 3.39b n.d. 5.14 Broccoli 4.12 7.78 2.42 4.12a 2.04a 7.66 n.d. 548b 576 8.94 0.64 5.08 n.d. 14.66 Sunflower 2.26 n.d. n.d. 1042 3.08a 5.10 n.d. 3.57a 1056 0.76abc n.d. 0.63a 0.23a 1.62 - Within columns, values with the same superscripts do not differ significantly at p < 0.05.
The
quantitative determination of the sum of phenolic acids and flavonoids
evaluated chromatographically did not compare directly with the total
phenolic content (Fig. 1). However, a significant correlation was observed (r = 0.729). Similar results were reported by Siger et al. (2012)
for lupin seeds. The difference could result from a lack of selectivity
of the colorimetric Folin–Ciocalteu method, as well as from the fact
that the assay used for the total phenol content determination can
interfere with other compounds (e.g. nitric compounds, saccharides) ( Siger et al., 2012). Statistically significant correlation (α = 0.05) between the sum of phenolic acids and flavonoids evaluated chromatographically vs. antioxidant activity evaluated by the FRAP method ( Table 1) was also observed in this study (r = 0.773).
3.5. The profile of bound phenolic acids and flavonoids
There
is information in the literature concerning the extraction and analysis
of polyphenols from plant materials, including seeds and sprouts.
However, most of it concerns aglycones (free phenolic acids), esters and
glycosides (Dueñas et al., 2009, Lin and Lai, 2006, Martinez-Villaluenga et al., 2010, Troszyńska et al., 2011 and Weisz et al., 2009).
There is scarce information concerning complexes of phenolic acids with
cell wall polymers. The bound phenolics are not extractable by organic
solvents, since the ester and glycosidic bonds between phenolic acids
and cell wall polymers are not hydrolysed by these solvents. Bound
phenolic acids are typically liberated from such complexes using
alkaline hydrolysis, acid hydrolysis or both (Ross et al., 2009).
In this work alkaline hydrolysis (10 M NaOH) with ascorbic and
ethylenediaminetetraacetic (EDTA) acids protection was performed. Ross et al. (2009) recommended this method, as it allows the majority of phenolic acids to be detected.
Table 3
shows the bound phenolic acids content of seeds and sprouts determined
by HPLC. Insignificant amounts of free phenolic acids were extracted in
the free phenolic acid fraction (Table 2).
However alkaline hydrolysis of the seeds and sprouts extracts, provided
the majority of the phenolic acids. The amount of total bound phenolic
acids increased after germination only for mung bean and sunflower (from
25.4 to 183 and from 758 to 1056 mg/100 g d.m., respectively), while
broccoli remained almost unchanged and for radish a small decrease in
total bound phenolic acids was observed. The seeds of mung bean
contained mainly sinapic acid, although slight amounts of gallic,
caffeic and p-coumaric acids were also detected. After
germination mung bean showed much larger amounts of these acids.
Moreover, ferulic and protocatechuic acids were also identified. Caffeic
and p-coumaric were the predominant acids in mung bean
sprouts. Broccoli and radish seeds contained mainly sinapic acid (566
and 994 mg/100 g d.m., respectively) and values did not increase after
germination. The other phenolic acids identified in broccoli seeds and
sprouts were gallic, protocatechuic, vanillic (the last one not detected
in seeds), caffeic, p-coumaric, ferulic and chlorogenic (not detected in sprouts). Radish sprouts contained lower concentration of caffeic, p-coumaric,
and ferulic acids than seeds, whereas protocatechuic and vanillic acids
identified in seeds were not found in sprouts.
The flavonoids contents after alkaline hydrolysis of seeds and sprouts are presented in Table 3.
The following flavonoids were identified: quercetin, kaempferol,
luteolin and apigenin. Hydrolysis improved extraction of phenolic
compounds from the materials. Comparing the results presented in Table 2 and Table 3,
a significant increase of total flavonoids content after hydrolysis was
observed. Germination increased the bound flavonoids level only in the
case of broccoli and sunflower. The main flavonoid identified in the
radish seeds and sprouts was luteolin. Apigenin was detected in broccoli
seeds, while quercetin and luteolin were present in broccoli sprouts.
The largest amount of bound flavonoids content was found in broccoli
seeds and sprouts, while the smallest amount was in mung bean seeds, and
sunflower seeds and sprouts. Statistically significant linear
correlation (α = 0.05) between the sum of bound phenolic acids and flavonoids evaluated chromatographically vs. antioxidant activity evaluated by DPPH and FRAP methods ( Table 1) was observed in this study (r = 0.754 and 0.874, respectively).
4. Conclusions
The
comparison of seeds and sprouts from different botanical sources is
very important, due to the fact that they vary in their polyphenolic
composition and antioxidant activity. Mung bean seeds are the cheapest
and germinate the easiest, when compared to radish, broccoli and
sunflower seeds. However, both seeds and sprouts of this plant exhibit
the lowest antioxidant activity and phenolic contents, being lower than
those of radish, broccoli and sunflower seeds. Germination significantly
increases the levels of phenolic acids and flavonoids, as well as their
antioxidant activity. Therefore, germinated edible seeds are a very
valuable source of natural antioxidants. Lyophilised sprouts could be
used as ingredients in functional foods.
Acknowledgement
The
scientific research was realized within a framework of grant nr
BM-4726/KAiOJŻ/2012 financed from budget of University of Agriculture in
Krakow, Poland. The part of results were presented at the 2nd
International Professional Conference On “Trends and Challenges in Food
Technology, Nutrition, Hospitality and Tourism”, November 16 And 17,
2012, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
References
- Benzie and Strain, 1996
- The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay
- Analytical Biochemistry, 239 (1996), pp. 70–76
- | |
- Boateng et al., 2008
- Effect of processing on antioxidant content in selected dry beans (Phaseolus spp. L.)
- LWT – Food Science and Technology, 41 (2008), pp. 1541–1547
- | | |
- Cevallos-Casals and Cisneros-Zevallos, 2010
- Impact of germination on phenolic content and antioxidant activity of 13 edible seed species
- Food Chemistry, 119 (2010), pp. 1485–1490
- | | |
- Dueñas et al., 2009
- Germination as a process to increase the polyphenol content and antioxidant activity of lupin seeds (Lupinus angustifolius L.)
- Food Chemistry, 117 (2009), pp. 599–607
- | |
- Gawlik-Dziki et al., 2012
- Effect of bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds on in vitro anticancer activity of broccoli sprouts
- Food Research International, 40 (2012), pp. 469–476
- | | |
- Gawlik-Dziki and Kowalczyk, 2007
- Influence of extraction conditions on antioxidant activity of extracts from radish sprouts
- Food Science and Technology Quality, 1 (50) (2007), pp. 132–139
- Hung et al., 2011
- Phenolic acid composition of sprouted wheats by ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and their antioxidant activities
- Food Chemistry, 126 (2011), pp. 1896–1901
- | |
- Karamać et al., 2012
- Antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds identified in sunflower seeds
- European Food Research and Technology, 235 (2012) (2012), pp. 221–230
- |
- Khattak et al., 2007
- Influence of germination techniques on phytic acid and polyphenols content of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) sprouts
- Food Chemistry, 104 (2007), pp. 1074–1079
- | | |
- Kim et al., 2012
- Total polyphenols, antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of different extractx in Mungbean seeds and sprouts
- Plant Foods and Human Nutrition, 67 (2012), pp. 71–75
- | |
- Koh et al., 2009
- Content of ascorbic acid, quercetin, kaempferol and total phenolics in commercial broccoli
- Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 22 (2009), pp. 637–643
- | | |
- Lin and Lai, 2006
- Bioactive compounds in legumes and their germinated products
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54 (11) (2006), pp. 3807–3814
- |
- Luthria and Pastor-Corrales, 2006
- Phenolic acids content of fifteen dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties
- Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 19 (2006), pp. 205–211
- | | |
- Martinez-Villaluenga et al., 2010
- Time dependence of bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity during germination of different cultivars of broccoli and radish seeds
- Food Chemistry, 120 (2010), pp. 710–716
- | |
- Meda et al., 2005
- Determination of the total phenolic, flavonoid and proline contents in Burkina Fasan honey, as well as their radical scavenging activity
- Food Chemistry, 91 (2005), pp. 571–577
- | | |
- Moure et al., 2001
- Antioxidant activity of extracts from Gevuina avellana and Rosa rubiginosa defatted seeds
- Food Research International, 34 (2001), pp. 103–109
- | |
- Naczk and Shahidi, 2004
- Extraction and analysis of phenolics in food
- Journal of Chromatography A, 1054 (2004), pp. 95–111
- | | |
- Nardini and Ghiselli, 2004
- Determination of free and bound phenolic acids in beer
- Food Chemistry, 84 (2004), pp. 137–143
- | |
- Oloyo, 2004
- Chemical and nutritional quality changes in germinating seeds of Cajanus cajan L
- Food Chemistry, 85 (2004), pp. 497–502
- | |
- Paśko et al., 2009
- Anhocyanins, total polyphenols and antioxidant activity in amaranth and quinoa seeds and sprouts during their growth
- Food Chemistry, 115 (2009), pp. 994–998
- | | |
- Paśko et al., 2008
- Analysis of selected phenolic acids and flavonoids in Amaranthus cruentus and Chenopodium quinoa seeds and sprouts by HPLC
- Acta Chromatographica, 20 (4) (2008), pp. 661–672
- | |
- Pérez-Balibrea et al., 2011
- Genotypic effects on the phytochemical quality of seeds and sprouts from commercial broccoli cultivars
- Food Chemistry, 125 (2011), pp. 348–354
- | | |
- Ross et al., 2009
- A comparative study on the phenolic acids identified and quantified in dry beans using HPLC as affected by different extraction and hydrolysis methods
- Food Chemistry, 113 (2009), pp. 336–344
- | |
- Samotyja et al., 2007
- Antioxidant properties of extracts of germinated seeds
- Food Science and Technology Quality, 5 (54) (2007), pp. 122–128
- Siger et al., 2012
- Antioxidant activity and phenolic content in three lupin species
- Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 25 (2012), pp. 190–197
- | | |
- Socha et al., 2011
- Phenolic profile and antioxidant properties of Polish honeys
- International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 46 (2011), pp. 528–534
- | |
- Troszyńska et al., 2011
- Relationship between the sensory quality of lentil (Lens culinaris) sprouts and their phenolic constituents
- Food Research International, 44 (2011), pp. 3195–3201
- | | |
- Vallejo et al., 2002
- Potential bioactive compounds in health promotion from broccoli cultivars grown in Spain
- Journal of the Sciences of Food and Agriculture, 82 (11) (2002), pp. 1293–1297
- |
- Weisz et al., 2009
- Identification and qantification of phenolic compounds from sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) kernels and shels by HPLC-DAD/ESI-MS
- Food Chemistry, 115 (2009), pp. 758–765
- | |
- Zieliński et al., 2005
- Vitamin B1 and B2, dietary fiber and minerals content of Cruciferae sprouts
- European Food Research and Technology, 221 (2005), pp. 78–83
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου